Climate Gate is YOUR fight
- Text size
The Blood of Patriots and Tyrants
November 27, 2009
Those in the know are fully aware that the mainstream media is nothing more than the propaganda arm of the State. You’re reading this, so you’re probably one of those people. It is so easy to fall into the mental trap that, if you know something, then how can it not be common knowledge? The sheep don’t even know what the carbon tax is, or what’s at stake in Copenhagen. They are completely and utterly clueless.
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Professor Phil Jones, director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the rest of us, the fight is joined. The globalists have thrown their best punches while we played rope-a-dope. Even before this scandal broke, they were running out of gas. Their gloves were heavy. A global agreement to supposedly cut carbon emissions, if you believed what the media told you (I don’t), was in already in jeopardy prior to the release of the hacked emails. These revelations are a flurry of knockout blows, if only we’re able to break through the media blackout and propaganda protecting these criminals from being fully exposed. The media will not be our ally in this.
The globalists, the eugenicists, are in this for the long haul. All of their eggs are in the climate hoax basket. They’re not going to stop now. Why would they? We all know this was never about climate change in the first place. We knew that they knew that it was the sun driving the climate, and that temperatures haven’t risen in at least ten years. If this were about saving the Earth – if they truly were not evil, just wrong, as the newest documentary naively suggests – then the climate scientists would’ve packed it in a long time ago.
No, what this is and always was about is an excuse for global government. This they certainly do not deny. Ban Ki-Moon, the UN Secretary General, penned an op-ed in the New York Times last month in which he called for a global government funded by carbon taxes. The new president of the European Union, Herman van Rompuy, said that 2009 was the first year of global governance, and that the Copenhagen climate conference would be “another step towards the global management of our planet”. In July, Al Gore spoke at Oxford University and stated that global governance, funded by the Waxman-Markey cap and trade tax which will be voted upon in the Senate within the coming weeks, is necessary for combating “climate change”.
The globalist plan for world government – the elimination of national sovereignty, ie the destruction of the United States of America – must be fully exposed. We know that this scheme is completely unknown to the vast majority of people. Perhaps now that Glenn Beck is finally speaking of this conspiracy, the Fox “News” crowd will get their heads out of their rears and realize it’s not “liberals” behind this, it’s globalists – there are prominent Republicans and so-called conservative leaders pushing this as well. Unfortunately, because Beck and Fox actively promote the left-right paradigm, the establishment will still try to paint the issue as an attack by right wing hacks and special interests.
This story does not belong to the media. It is ours alone. BBC was given these emails a full month before they were leaked on the internet, but refused to report on the story. Did the BBC really believe something so sensational would just disappear for the simple fact that they didn’t report it? Why not report on the story, if only to downplay it and attack climate change skeptics, like every other news outlet has? Who knows.
After laughably claiming that the story spread fast, CNN did its first story on the scandal a full six days after the emails were leaked. The story repeatedly refers to “the consensus” on climate change and claims the emails contained “little context”. To CNN’s credit, they actually showed their viewers one of the emails, in which a scientist boasts of completing a “trick” to “hide the decline” in the “real temps” since 1961. That’s not a typo – 1961. Objective readers are capable of making their own judgments, but this is an obviously damning admission.
Contrast CNN’s story with other hit pieces such as the Guardian’s, in which “journalist” Mark Lynas laments the “dangerous shift in climate denial strategy”, targeting and unfairly vilifying these infallible and heroic scientists. Al Gore is a politician, you see – he can take it – but these climate change deniers, akin to creationists and 9-11 truthers, have gone too far, making “no distinction between the political and the scientific sphere.” Of course, again, their emails have been taken out of context – they are really nothing more than the private views of the scientists which surely have been left out of their work. Alas, Lynas was insufficiently moved by any sense of journalistic integrity to provide the supposedly out of context emails so his readers could make their own judgment, else his readers would’ve seen that, far from the proponents of climate change themselves being subjected to “personal attacks, exposure of their private lives and vilification”, these proponents cheered the death of skeptics, fantasized about assaulting them, and conspired to deny them funding and suppress their works in peer reviewed journals.
Meanwhile, a new hit piece today from Reuters claims it’s all a “smear campaign” designed “to distract from reasoned debate” about climate change. Again, like the Guardian piece, the emails are said to be taken out of context and “cherry-picked”, with not one direct citation of the emails in question provided to the reader. Instead the article extensively quotes the guilty parties’ lame excuses, and claims that, despite the “science” being decided, it just can’t seem to silence the skeptics. Michael Mann, co-author of the Copenhagen Diagnosis and lead author of the UN IPCC Third Assessment Report and one of the exposed scientists, claims that he and his colleagues “often speak in a language they understand and is often foreign to the outside world.” These Holocaust deniers have cherry-picked the emails and turned “something innocent into something nefarious.” This claim might have been augmented by actually showing the supposed “cherry-picked”, out of context emails, which would’ve shown that, in fact, these scientists speak in plain, coherent English that any 6 year old can comprehend, but again journalistic integrity takes a back seat to demagoguery. Revealing the content of the emails would also show that, far from this being a “sustained” and “vexatious campaign” against the guilty parties, it was the authors of these emails who were responsible for quelling “reasoned debate”, displaying their hostility, in words and actions, towards climate change skeptics.
I wouldn’t even call myself a journalist – I’m just a guy in a room in his boxer briefs – but allow me to do my part to apply journalistic integrity to my own work by citing as many of the emails in question as I can find.
• In one email, dated November 1999, Professor Phil Jones, director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit, wrote: “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature [the science journal] trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie, from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.” Defenders of Jones have ridiculously tried to pull a Clinton and say “that all depends on what your definition of ‘is’ is,” in reference to the use of the word “trick”, saying it simply refers to a “trick of the trade”, pretending not to notice this “trick” was used to “hide the decline” in “real temps” since 1961. If the Earth is warming, why does he need to hide any decline?
• In another email, Phil Jones calls the sudden death of prominent climate change skeptic John Daly “cheering news!”
• Kevin Trenberth, head of the Climate Analysis Section at the National Center for Atmospheric Research and a lead author of the 2001 and 2007 IPCC Scientific Assessment of Climate Change, penned the following email discussing the BBC’s supposed turn around on climate change:
Well I have my own article on where the heck is global warming? We are asking that here in Boulder where we have broken records the past two days for the coldest days on record. We had 4 inches of snow. The high the last 2 days was below 30F and the normal is 69F, and it smashed the previous records for these days by 10F. The low was about 18F and also a record low, well below the previous record low.
[...]
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.
• Tom Wigley, a senior scientist in the Climate and Global Dynamics Division at University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, wrote an email to Phil Jones in which he betrays knowledge of data that would discredit their theories on climate change, saying, “Land warming since 1980 has been twice the ocean warming — and skeptics might claim that this proves that urban warming is real and important.”
• In another email, Phil Jones appears to be instructing fellow scientists to delete incriminating emails subject to FOIA requests:
Mike,
Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?
Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.
Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.
We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.
• John Overpeck, director of the Institute of the Environment at University of Arizona, in an email suggests that scientists are aware that their claim that 1998 was the warmest year on record is likely false:
I agree, that we don’t want to be seen as being too clever or defensive. Note however, that all the TAR said was “likely” the warmest in the last 1000 years. Our chapter and figs (including 6.10) make it clear that it is unlikely any multi-decadal period was as warm as the last 50 years. But, that said, I do feel your are right that our team would not have said what the TAR said about 1998, and thus, we should delete that second sentence.
• In another incriminating email, Phil Jones discusses his evident reluctance to hand over information, and suggests sending the requested information just as raw data, which would “annoy” those behind the FOI request:
Options appear to be:
Send them the data
Send them a subset removing station data from some of the countries who made us pay in the normals papers of Hulme et al. (1990s) and also any number that David can remember. This should also omit some other countries like (Australia, NZ, Canada, Antarctica). Also could extract some of the sources that Anders added in (31-38 source codes in J&M 2003). Also should remove many of the early stations that we coded up in the 1980s.
Send them the raw data as is, by reconstructing it from GHCN. How could this be done? Replace all stations where the WMO ID agrees with what is in GHCN. This would be the raw data, but it would annoy them.
• In this email, Michael Mann, Professor and Director of the Earth System Science Center at Penn State, conspires to muffle skepticism about his website Real Climate:
guys, I see that Science has already gone online w/ the new issue, so we put up the RC post. By now, you’ve probably read that nasty McIntyre thing. Apparently, he violated the embargo on his website (I don’t go there personally, but so I’m informed).
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Anyway, I wanted you guys to know that you’re free to use RC in any way you think would be helpful. Gavin and I are going to be careful about what comments we screen through, and we’ll be very careful to answer any questions that come up to any extent we can. On the other hand, you might want to visit the thread and post replies yourself. We can hold comments up in the queue and contact you about whether or not you think they should be screened through or not, and if so, any comments you’d like us to include.
You’re also welcome to do a followup guest post, etc. think of RC as a resource that is at your disposal to combat any disinformation put forward by the McIntyres of the world. Just let us know. We’ll use our best discretion to make sure the skeptics dont’get to use the RC comments as a megaphone…
• In another email, Jones admits he will delete data rather than comply with FOI requests to disclose data which would show the basis for their dire warnings about global warming:
Just sent loads of station data to Scott. Make sure he documents everything better this time ! And don’t leave stuff lying around on ftp sites – you never know who is trawling them. The two MMs have been after the CRU station data for years. If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the UK, I think I’ll delete the file rather than send to anyone. Does your similar act in the US force you to respond to enquiries within 20 days? – our does ! The UK works on precedents, so the first request will test it.We also have a data protection act, which I will hide behind. Tom Wigley has sent me a worried email when he heard about it – thought people could ask him for his model code. He has retired officially from UEA so he can hide behind that. IPR should be relevant here, but I can see me getting into an argument with someone at UEA who’ll say we must adhere to it!
• This email from Phil Jones shows that he was warned against deleted emails subject to FOI requests:
Haven’t got a reply from the FOI person here at UEA. So I’m not entirely confident the numbers are correct. One way of checking would be to look on CA, but I’m not doing that. I did get an email from the FOI person here early yesterday to tell me I shouldn’t be deleting emails – unless this was ‘normal’ deleting to keep emails manageable! McIntyre hasn’t paid his £10, so nothing looks likely to happen re his Data Protection Act email.
Anyway requests have been of three types – observational data, paleo data and who made IPCC changes and why. Keith has got all the latter – and there have been at least 4. We made Susan aware of these – all came from David Holland. According to the FOI Commissioner’s Office, IPCC is an international organization, so is above any national FOI. Even if UEA holds anything about IPCC, we are not obliged to pass it on, unless it has anything to do with our core business – and it doesn’t! I’m sounding like Sir Humphrey here!
• Jones seems to fear the Freedom of Information Acts, telling his colleagues, “I’m getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a Freedom of Information Act !”
• Jones figured out how to circumvent those FOI requests:
Wei-Chyung and Tom,
The Climate Audit web site has a new thread on the Jones et al. (1990) paper, with lots of quotes from Keenan. So they may not be going to submit something to Albany. Well may be?!?
Just agreed to review a paper by Ren et al. for JGR. This refers to a paper on urbanization effects in China, which may be in press in J. Climate. I say ‘may be’ as Ren isn’t that clear about this in the text, references and responses to earlier reviews. Have requested JGR get a copy a copy of this in order to do the review.In the meantime attaching this paper by Ren et al. on urbanization at two sites in China.Nothing much else to say except:
1. Think I’ve managed to persuade UEA to ignore all further FOIA requests if the people have anything to do with Climate Audit
2. Had an email from David Jones of BMRC, Melbourne. He said they are ignoring anybody who has dealings with CA, as there are threads on it about Australian sites.
3. CA is in dispute with IPCC (Susan Solomon and Martin Manning) about the availability of the responses to reviewer’s at the various stages of the AR4 drafts. They are most interested here re Ch 6 on paleo.
Cheers
Phil
• And another from Jones, also regarding suppressing FOI requests:
Ben,
When the FOI requests began here, the FOI person said we had to abide by the requests. It took a couple of half hour sessions – one at a screen, to convince them otherwise showing them what CA was all about. Once they became aware of the types of people we were dealing with, everyone at UEA (in the registry and in the Environmental Sciences school – the head of school and a few others) became very supportive. I’ve got to know the FOI person quite well and the Chief Librarian – who deals with appeals. The VC is also aware of what is going on.
• Apparently the FOI doesn’t apply to climate change skeptics who want to see where these quacks are getting their whacko theories from. Another email from Tom Wigley to Phil Jones conspires to minimize data to exaggerate a warming trend:
Here are some speculations on correcting SSTs to partly explain the 1940s warming blip. If you look at the attached plot you will see that the land also shows the 1940s blip (as I’m sure you know).So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC, then this would be significant for the global mean – but we’d still have to explain the land blip. I’ve chosen 0.15 here deliberately. This still leaves an ocean blip, and i think one needs to have some form of ocean blip to explain the land blip (via either some common forcing, or ocean forcing land, or vice versa, or all of these). When you look at other blips, the land blips are 1.5 to 2 times (roughly) the ocean blips—higher sensitivity plus thermal inertia effects. My 0.15 adjustment leaves things consistent with this, so you can see where I am coming from.Removing ENSO does not affect this.It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.Let me go further. If you look at NH vs SH and the aerosol effect (qualitatively or with MAGICC) then with a reduced ocean blip we get continuous warming in the SH, and a cooling in the NH—just as one would expect with mainly NH aerosols.The other interesting thing is (as Foukal et al. note – from MAGICC) that the 1910-40 warming cannot be solar. The Sun can get at most 10% of this with Wang et al solar, less with Foukal solar. So this may well be NADW, as Sarah and I noted in 1987 (and also Schlesinger later). A reduced SST blip in the 1940s makes the 1910-40 warming larger than the SH (which it currently is not)—but not really enough.So … why was the SH so cold around 1910? Another SST problem? (SH/NH data also attached.)This stuff is in a report I am writing for EPRI, so I’d appreciate any comments you (and Ben) might have.Tom.
• This email from Phil Jones to Michael Mann shows a conspiracy to keep skeptics Chris de Freitas and Roger Pielke out of the IPCC report:
The other paper by MM is just garbage – as you knew. De Freitas again. Pielke is also losing all credibility as well by replying to the mad Finn as well – frequently as I see it. I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. K and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !
• In another email, Benjamin Santer, climate researcher at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and lead author of the IPCC, said, “Next time I see (CATO Institute climate change skeptic) Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted.”
• Source: Austrailia Herald Sun
You can draw your own conclusions from these emails, and decide for yourself whether they are cherry-picked and taken out of context, and whether it is the proponents being vilified by the skeptics or vice-versa. It’s clear that if this were a “smear campaign”, if they were taken out of context, the media would not be so loathe to provide them in context with their own lies regarding what is said in them. As usual, you must do your own research, and it is up to you to push this into the public eye.
Most Americans don’t even know about the carbon tax, and many of them, even if they’re skeptical that man is behind global warming, are unaware that if there ever was global warming, it ended at least 10 years ago and the Earth has been cooling for several years, driven by a startling lack of solar activity. They must be made aware, and they must have a fire lit under the backsides, to understand that they cannot sit around unaware and uncaring of current events. The carbon tax is a pretext to global government, which is a pretext to depopulation – genocide. This is no longer about being “into politics”. It’s survival. Push for an aggressive congressional investigation. Write to your local newspaper. Call in to talk radio. Motivate others to do the same. The media will not drive this story. In fact they will do everything in their power to suppress it. Despite their deteriorating credibility, they still wield incredible influence over the masses – in this case simply by refusing to inform the public of a scandal related to an issue that affects us all. This is our fight. Squad up.
RSS - Posts
December 4th, 2009 at 11:37 amGuys hold on a minute. Nancy Peeosi is clearing all these allegations up. She just made a speech at Obama youth Camp of Marin County this morning. It appears that these stolen emails have been altered by Reconmarines and other Alex Jones Posters even some on this blog site. You have gone to far in your conspiracy propaganda and scientifically unsuportable theories. I mean like guys how can you have an opinion when you have not looked at Dr. Al Gores movie, Inconvency Truisms, and heard him speak. Journalism of which I am a student teaches to tell both sides of the story, I am have seen very little of you discussing the supporting research for Global Warming. Please watch Dr. Chris Matthews on MSNBC Monday. He is going to put a stop to these false allegations with a scientific news report on Global Warming which will unequivically prove it to be fact and well kind of sort like a NWO religion which must be followed. I suppose those of you who are not the dominant islamic relegion in America will need an official announcement from the Pope to bring you out of your dogmagtic and unyielding narrow minded, non scientific way of thinking. You have all got me very sick this weekend, and I have not been able to sleep. Dr. Katz has prescribed me some elderberry tea to sooth my anxiousnous. You are making us liberals very ill with your propagandous slander. Please think this over carefully. The world is at stake here and all the polar bears and marsh mice in the bay area.
CA GIRL
CLIMATOLIGIST/COSMOTOLIGIST
Reply
MrReality Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 12:00 pm
Hey Lucy, good to see back. It sure is refreshing to know that someone has a sense of humor and you sure are the queen of that here. We surely hope that you don’t believe what you write and are just trying play devils advocate. For if you do believe it, you need to take more than elderberry tea to cure your insanity!!
Hope you are well or aleast healing nicely!!!
Reply
LUCY LIB PHD Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 8:42 am
;>} I never left.
HAVE A NICE DAY !!!
Reply
Steve Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
Hi Lucy,
Good luck on you journalism. A bit of advice; check your spelling.
I hope you are better from your anxiousnous (I think you meant anxiety).
Best regards,
Steve
Reply
LUCY LIB PHD Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 8:41 am
steve Sir,
Spelling is a new learning concept in CA schools and we spell how the word sounds. Teachers do not take off points for spelling so as not to hurt the esteem of the students. It is state law now. Your are behined the new Obama Learning techniques
for the Peoples children of the Future. All communication will be spoken and writing will become a thing of the primitive conservative society. Wake up steve. CA leads the world in Diveristy, and also invented Eubonics and Jive talk, and the popular new wrap talk and music. Like you know Steve get with the new generation grandpaw before your ticker expires. I will send the end of life counselors to your apartment soon.
Reply
holdurbreath Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 9:06 am
Ya Steve.
Lucy,So you are a clitologist.AWESOME.
Reply
MYSPACE/ERIKTHERED9 Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
THIS IS GOOD NEWS, I POSTED THAT INITIAL VID YESTERDAY ON ALEX JONES MYSPACE BLOGS WHERE AL GORE IS IN THE BOOK STORE. I LOVE THAT VIDEO OF THOSE GUYS SCREAMING AT HIM. ITS BEAUTIFUL. NOW IF EVERYONE STOOD UP FOR UNIVERSAL TRUTH IN THE SAME WAY THEN THE WICKED WOULD BE POWERLESS.
EVERYONE KEEP THE PRESSURE ON THESE GLOBALIST SCUMBAGS AND WAKE UP ALL THE SHEEPLE THE BEST YOU CAN EVERYWHERE YOU GO. THESE WICKED PARASITES THINK THEY CAN JUST DO WHATEVER THEY PLEASE AND ENSLAVE US ALL. STAND TALL FOR YOUR FREEDOM AND STAND TALL FOR INTEGRITY BECAUSE THATS WHAT BRINGS YOU FREEDOM. UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ARE FIGHTING FOR YOUR OWN LIVES AND THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN. MAY THE TRUTH SET YOU FREE.
p.s…..what kind of pathetic sarcasm is LUCY LIB ? Are you people really this far gone out there ? SNAP OUT OF IT.
Reply
william b travis Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
heard john coleman on with george noory last night
he is a meteorologist and founder of the weather channel
he told about how al gore was profoundly influenced by a college professor
who was the source of the global warming theory
the professor has since recanted this theory
but gore refuses to do so
it s no surprise gore was a D student in his class
Reply
Beavis Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 3:16 pm
What to Lucy baby “Show the incline.” keep posting sweet thang .. .X
Reply
LUCY LIB PHD Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 8:36 am
Beavis why don’t you use your real name???? BEAVER. I know what you and your friends did last summer in Sam Mateo. Your are being tracked by the NWO super snooper satelite which as been reassinged to the OBama Youth Brigade Since Senator Kennedy passsed.
Reply
Beavis Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
Jeez baby, hope they haven’t filmed us ‘getting it on’ ?
Jim Shores Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 9:01 pm
I think where you have been putting the French Bread is giving you the Yeast infections that have been driving you crazier. It was not Global Warming like Dr. Gore said.
Reply
LUCY LIB PHD Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 8:34 am
Mr. Shores Sir,
You always have to get filthy with your comments. You sir are not gentleman, I will thank you to keep quiet, and stop with your dirty, filthy thoughts. Your filthy man paws will never touch my silky drawers. Dream Own you Neanderthrawl throw back.
Reply
lorents Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 4:33 am
i really like the comment about the waiting for the pope to make a statement about global warming. mr. pope is the frontman for the world global mafia. are you blind? i guess so. whats the first thing you do when your conquering a new land? thats right. you send in the missionaries. the church is the front line and heads all world change for the good of themselves. all in the name of power and control.
Reply
Beavis Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
lorents. You are very right.
Reply
We who say nay. Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 6:33 am
I think you should get your own TV show on the Comedy Channel.
Regards,
Moi-meme
Reply
LUCY LIB PHD Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 8:31 am
Thank you who say nay,
I have been to Holloywood for a few months when I was young, and made some movies, but well guys like you know that were more like bb rated and I never exactly got paid as much as the big stars. But I do think you for the Compliment, I have been writing to Opra for years, and may get my first big break with a singing group from my Obama Youth camp class this Quansa season. I really do appreciate that some of Alex Bloggers agree with me and my quest to Save the Planet from Global Warming.
Excuse me now guys, I have to attend a Global Warming seminar with Arnie Today.
Wish me luck!!!
have a nice day guys ;>))
Reply
Beavis Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 1:50 pm
Did they involve wearing exotic lingere whereby a young man might get aroused?
Not very Christian is it Lucy?
Oh. I forgot. You and Obama’s crowd are Communists. XXX
December 4th, 2009 at 12:17 pmFun aside: This is financial fraud. Can’t Gore be charged under the RICO act or something. Where’s Bugliosi when you need him. Class Action lawsuits maybe? I mean, Gore was screaming FIRE in a crowded theater, locked the doors and instead sold asbesto suits. It was that low. And there is no doubt that his co-conspirators, the scientists were being handsomely paid, to keep their mouths shut and go along.
Here are some details about Michael Milken for example:
On March 29, 1989, financier Michael Milken was indicted on 98 counts of racketeering and fraud relating to an investigation into insider trading and other offenses. Milken was accused of using a wide-ranging network of contacts to manipulate stock and bond prices. It was one of the first occasions that a RICO indictment was brought against an individual with no ties to organized crime. Milken pled guilty to six lesser offenses rather than face spending the rest of his life in prison.
Reply
Ed Brotherton Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
If it can be proven that he has obtained funds directly or indirectly from the Federal Government based on these claims. Then he can be prosecuted under the False Claims Act.
Reply
Angry Moderate Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
Great point and supporting info, mark. However, I would rather hang Gore from the top of Washington Monument and then set him ablaze with the words, “I Lied About Global Warming!”
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 12:23 pmOh for the love of god. You didn’t need these emails to come out to know that man-made global warming is a fraud. Is global warming happening? Yes. But it doesn’t mean it’s man-made and all this talk about it being altered by reconmarines and other Alex Jones posters is just rediculous. It’s interesting how you put Dr. in front of Chris Mathews as if that is going to give him some magical powers and credibility.
It’s obvious what’s going on here. They got there hands caught in the cookie jar. They have to find a way to discredit what happened and then they will play the victim. You say all these allegations are going to be stopped by a SCIENTIFIC news report. Well lets just hope it isn’t the same kind of science the fraudsters used.
Tell me CA GIRL how do you know he is going to put an end to these allegations? Have you seen the “scientific” news report already. Do you know something we all don’t know. I’ve known about this fraud for years. I know how the hockey stick graph they used was bad science and besides the real data shows CO2 follows tempreture with about a 800 year lag. So how is it that CO2 is the cause of the Temp rise. It’s not! 30,000 scientist disagree with you. You’re own peers for crying out loud. If you have something to offer then write a paper and submit it. Instead of coming on here trying to spill your propaganda.
Consider yourself exposed for the accessory to fraud that you are.
Reply
carbide Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 6:15 pm
That email was a joke from CA Girl. If you didn’t smell the sarcasm, you don’t get out much. But it was good reading your counter argument, though.
Reply
d Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 6:55 am
Actually global warming is not happening at all, quite the reverse. And to assume that these scientists are just doing this for money would be a mistake, there is a global agenda to drive global government and AGW was just the best excuse they had this time around. Just wait, another excuse will come along very soon now AGW is no longer usefull.
All the moron scientists blindly following their masters will be dumped and thrown to the lions, human sacrifice, as that is the way it works.
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 1:06 pmIGNORANCE IS NO DEFENSE AGAINST AGW FRAUD and/or TREASON.
The CRU FOI leaked documents are smoking gun evidence of AGW fraud.
To make the claim, as they have done, that it changes nothing, shows a reckless and blatant disregard for hard evidence in the case of the most important decision we have ever been coerced to make as a species.
This is the profile of psychopaths.
To push ahead with a treaty at Copenhagen will make that summit the largest crime scene in history.
All the worlds most prominent political criminals and population reductionist, eugenics obsessed, intergenerational Nazi’s, gathered together in one place at the same time.
Can you say, “citizens arrest” ???!!!
Don’t believe AGW is a fraud, know it!
http://www.spinonthat.com/CO2.html
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 1:36 pmthe entire us government is illegitimate
it s time to throw all the bums and grifters out
vote out all incumbent dems and repubs
Reply
carbide Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 6:21 pm
We should place a national strike on democrats and republicans, and create a Truth Party. Both have failed us by supporting treasonous and unlawful actions, which counter our personal freedoms, liberties and American soverignty for the sake of a globalist agenda.
As for Gore, I knew something was fishy from him own global warming once I found out that his dad and him owned a coal mine and factory back in the day, and still do to this very day. Plus notice how the blame of bad climate (they don’t really mention pollution) is pointed towards everyday people and activites and not the billions of pesticides and pollutants that pumped out by the industrial industry.
Reply
Beavis Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 1:55 pm
No. You should look at the Constitution, read it, inwardly digest, and realise where you are going wrong . We must stop being a Nation of ‘bed wetters’……
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 1:38 pmMr. Gore is an A.C.O.R.N. that hasn’t fallen far from the tree. His dad sucked, too.
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 2:07 pmyet another reason for not trusting the government. 99% of politicians are as crooked as a dog’s hind leg. what this country needs is some accountability and responsibility in not only government, but in the general population as well. even in my lifetime things have changed for the worse. it seems people just dont have the spine to stand on their own without the help and direction of the government, and the kids in school dont know how to think through a problem, much less being able to think for themselves. what ever happened to self-reliance? times have sure changed since my coming of age.
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 2:32 pmIn TIME magazine, Page 10, December 7, 2009, Doris Wakeland of Silver City, N.M. states: “We made a big mistake in 2000. Al Gore is the closest thing we have to a 21st Century Prophet”….
Big Al has been called many things but being called a “Prophet” is a first for me….
Reply
Stumpy Stinkum Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 12:50 pm
Oh didn’t you know…
The Algore is a prophet of Gaia in this New World Order lucifarian earth worshiping World religion they are creating. You see this way, they don’t have to have “evidence”, they tell their people to just have Faith! They were planning on purging all of us heretics at the Copenhagen Inquisition coming up next week. A taxation sacrifice to the almighty gaia so she will bring back Winter! But Climategate threw a monkey wrench in their plans, however, don’t go to sleep out there, because there are still believers everywhere, and they want our money!
Al Gore is truely an imp of satan, this guy has profited from the misery of people in this country for far too long. My fervent hope is that Climategate will be the straw that broke the back of AGW and that Blood and Gore end up broke and living on the street! Oh if we could only get so lucky! I make it a practice to never wish bad things on people, but I can’t think of any other man today that deserves to go broke more than Al Gore, after NAFTA and GAT, and now Cap and Trade! This man is a cancer on our society and he needs a little Chemo!
If you’re reading this – you are the resistance…
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 2:35 pmWe don’t need big government, we need big ideas!
Reply
Beavis Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Who said that? Aristotle..not many left like him anymore, mores the pity. Pygmies that’s all you get now in goverment.
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 2:35 pmWe need freedom.
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 2:46 pmWe just need truth and if only people would listen. Good on you Alex for all the work you do in exposing these frauds. I know how hard it can be and things one can be called and labeled. But the truth has never been popular.
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 2:50 pmSince we know that Polar Bears can swim, can someone please throw Gore out into the frigid waters of the North Pole and see if he can swim? Since the climate is warmer now, he won’t need a wet suit, only a speedo. GRoss – GAGME!!!!
Reply
Stumpy Stinkum Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 1:59 pm
Polar bears can swim…but can Manbearpig? I’m Serial!!!!
If you’re reading this – you are the resistance…
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 3:09 pmisrael uses ukranian children as spare parts
Reply
Beavis Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 3:26 pm
I hope they are kosher.
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 3:12 pmtar and feathers for big AL”I invented the internet” globalist/communist Gore.
oh..and you can throw in Nancy I’m the biggets lieing commie that ever lived”Pelosi and her bull dyk pal Barbara” I’m so fucking stupid my dog even hates me” Boxer!!!!!
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 3:22 pmGuess they figure if the media can just hold out long enough, only the right wing might know about this and they will stop talking about it or worrying about it, and they can go back to lying. What they don’t realize is that the left is equally furious at this massive fraud and we will not go away until there is honest widespread coverage.
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 8:16 pmPeople who waste 1,200 to listen to Gore must be nuts??????
Or just plain brainwashed
Reply
vic Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 8:17 pm
What this guy Gore and Schwarzenegger deserve would be a basket of tomatoes nothing more.
I would not pay a cent to hear these evil people.
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 8:35 pmIndustrialized nations are like a car – they both need an engine to run and that engine needs fuel. The fuel being oil which produces CO2.
To stop the car in its tracks and render it useless then just cut of the fuel supply – same with the industrialized nation. However, this can be a bit drastic as cutting of a nations fuel supply will cause havoc (or cause the car to crash or cause an accident).
So with the car simply muffle the exaust with some cotton wool and it will slowly come to a halt as it has been stopped from expelling CO2.
With the industrialized nations just muffle the people and stop the production of CO2 and like the car they will come to a halt!!!!!
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 8:58 pmThe space cadets out there refer to Al gore as the reptilian shape shifter, I’m assuming that it means he able to change his identity at will. I don’t see what difference it makes what form he takes he a rat no matter how he presents himself to the public. The reason I believe that hes dodging his sales pitch on global warming is that he knows that the people know he nothing but snake oil salesman trying to ram a pack of lies down there throats, but a good con man knows when to pickup his stand and hightail it out of town before his luck runs out.
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 9:16 pmBehind Global Warming
by J. R. Nyquist
Weekly Column Published: 12.04.2009
Print
What does the theory of anthropogenic global warming signify? On the Web Site of the Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise we find a page on coping with economic sabotage. “Sabotage is a wartime concept,” it says. “In simplest terms, sabotage means deliberate or underhand damage or destruction, especially carried out for military or political reasons.” This includes “interferences with production … as by enemy agents….” There is also another definition that should be referred too, as well. Political subversion may be defined as the “lending of aid, comfort, and moral support to individuals, groups, or organizations that advocate the overthrow of incumbent governments….”
On Monday, November 16, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev made the following statement with regard to global warming: “If we don’t take joint action now … the Arctic and Antarctic ice could melt and change ocean levels.” He further warned that this would “have catastrophic consequences.” The Russian president’s statement is odd, since Russia is a country that would benefit from global warming. But, as Russia’s clandestine services are aligned with the international left, and the international left is fervently committed to the global warming ideology, politics must trump Russia’s desire for a better climate.
It is no accident, in light of this, that the planet’s chief spokesman for global warming, former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, Jr., owed a great deal to Moscow’s “capitalist prince,” Armand Hammer. While Hammer siphoned money to many politicians, he especially enriched Gore’s father, Senator Al Gore, Sr. About this relationship one of Hammer’s close associates, British journalist Neil Lyndon, wrote, “Throughout the whole of his life, Al Gore Sr. and his family depended on pay-outs, kickbacks and subventions from Hammer. Like his father before him, Al Gore Jr.’s political career was lavishly sponsored by Hammer from the moment it began until Hammer died….”
In times past, the FBI described Hammer’s corporate holdings as “an organization of Soviet intelligence.” The U.S. State Department referred to him as a “Soviet mail carrier.” German intelligence found that Hammer was involved with the Soviet trade mission in Berlin, and assumed he was a Communist agent. According to researcher Edward Jay Epstein’s book, Dossier: The Secret History of Armand Hammer, a British raid on a Soviet trading company in London on 12 May 1927 revealed Hammer’s true role. “Among the incriminating documents were records directly linking the Hammer enterprise to Moness Chemicals,” noted Epstein, “which was servicing Comintern espionage agents in Germany and Britain. When this was reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Moness’s office in New York were searched, and agents found a paper trail that included … $5,000 ‘loans’ from Harry [Armand] Hammer. The bureau was also able to trace the various people and causes to whom these ‘loans’ were to be channeled. Hammer was funneling money from his Berlin office to Moness’s herbal-remedy company, which was then disbursing it to Soviet secret agents.”
To understand global warming, we need to understand the work of Soviet and Russian secret agents. Through an alarmist message, certain groups have become influential. They have mobilized a powerful and active constituency. They are lobbying for government programs. They seek government intervention in the economy. They also seek the “socialization” of industry and commerce, while offering an irresistible critique of greedy corporate interests threatening the whole planet. In short, these groups have initiated an attack against the capitalist system.
In light of this, consider what we have recently learned from the scandal that has blown the cover off the “scientific side” of the global warming scare. In his Telegraph.co.uk column of 20 November, James Delingpole begins with the following warning to investors: “If you own any shares in alternative energy companies … start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth has been suddenly … exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit and released 61 megabytes of confidential files onto the internet.” Here was proof of conspiracy and fraud. For example, statistical tricks were used to hide a recent decline in global temperatures. Other data was fudged or cherry-picked. When the public sought more specific data, information was withheld and legal requests were evaded.
Even more interesting, L.D. Breen published a piece on 27 November titled “White House Science Czar Involved in Climategate.” It seems that the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Dr. John P. Holdren, has been caught in the scandal. As it happens, Dr. Holdren was Al Gore’s global warming advisor, and apparently wrote e-mails that reveal a totally unscientific approach to climate change. After reviewing Holdren’s correspondence, Canadian Climatologist Dr. Tim Ball noted that Holdren’s “position devolves to a political position.” Of course, since Holdren has previously advocated a global totalitarian regime replete with compulsory abortion and mass sterilization, he has good reason to push forward an alarming prognosis (as do all totalitarian minions, including Russia’s president).
Going back to the definitions offered at the beginning of this column, I should remind readers that the establishment of a “planetary regime” of compulsory abortion and mass sterilization necessarily entails the overthrow of the United States Constitution and the eradication of individual liberty. If “scientific” theories concocted in support of such a program are not subversive, then nothing is. Intelligent people everywhere need to wake up and take notice. Those who want to spend trillions to combat global warming in the midst of a world-wide financial crisis should also be regarded as saboteurs. It is not only about money, however. It is about political power and political credibility being passed to totalitarian extremists whose justifications for dictatorial power are environmental. Here is the significance of global warming, laid bare for all to see.
Copyright © 2009 Jeffrey R. Nyquist
Reply
johnny B Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 10:46 am
Excellent article mary,
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 9:16 pmHopefully the Al Gore image has fallen and smashed,like a mirror, into a thousand pieces so he can no longer manipulate our vanity or wallet
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 9:25 pmGREAT ARticle: But it seems like the majority still aren’t aware this is happening and it’s just another media cover up and we’re fighting to disseminate the truth cause they won’t talk about hiding the decline, tricks, suppressing FOIA, discrediting skeptics, and ignoring medieval warning.
I’m worried that by ignoring, they keep the rest of the population in the dark and spring AL GORE back out onto an unsuspecting public.
How can we get the message out more clearly about the emails. They seem to focus only on ‘HIDE THE DECLINE’ and they are minimizing the rest to discredit anyone. I feel like I’m in the twilight zone or invasion of the body snatchers. The wealth and greed behind this must be enormous.
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 10:05 pmI congratulate all those such as “we are change” who get in Al Gores face and ask the tough questions.
I would like to see someone ask Al Gore — what would his cap and trade do to clean up all the spent depleted uranium shells that are poisoning the earth where ever the American Military go.
Bosnia, Iraq etc — all those DU shells poison the ground and nothing grows there anymore except the cancerous tumors in the children born in the wasteland areas littered with DU shells
Reply
December 4th, 2009 at 11:33 pm$1200 dollars???? To see algore speak? LOL! what a hoot! Talk about suckers. I want to know who those people are. I would love to see that list. I could make a killing selling shit to them.
Ken
http://www.LaserGuidedLoogie.com
Reply
December 5th, 2009 at 1:29 amImagine if WAC had confronted him at Copenhagen, it would have been international news.
Reply
December 5th, 2009 at 1:57 amReVaLuTiOn Iz My NaMe
Reply
December 5th, 2009 at 2:04 amNotice
From this moment the term to be ‘Al Gored’ is to take on the meaning of being found out as a complete liar and/or fraudster.
Hopefully this will soon be added to the Oxford English
Reply
December 5th, 2009 at 5:09 amhttp://911essentials.com says we want to know his name no more.
Reply
December 5th, 2009 at 7:16 amAl Gore should be arrested, i mean what is taking so Loonngg for him to get arrested, all you have to is ask a Cop nicely to do it, just say Fraud, and thats it, then use the same tactic on the rest of thr NWO fools, simple but effective.
Reply
December 5th, 2009 at 9:04 amHe is finished! What a complete idiot. He was hired by some unknown entity to push climate change. He went from an underdog and to not having a job to all of a sudden to Mr. Global Warming and is making billions. Goregate!
Reply
December 5th, 2009 at 11:12 amPlease Help Me Spread These Viral Vibes…..
1) Kenneth Lay the ex-CEO of ENRON invented the Carbon Credit Tax Scam
2) Exxon, Royal Dutch Shell, and British Petroleum were all funding ” Climate Science ”
3) Liberals and Greenies will go down in history as The Biggest Suckers the World has Ever Known…
It’s all true,,,,that’s the Beauty of it
These vibes are helping to wake people up, because the libs and greenies hate the Oil Companies and no one wants to be a sucker or a dupe……
Spread the word folks……
Reply
Beavis Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 2:06 pm
It’s a bit like the bible isn’t it?
People that are conning us. God Forbid.
Reply
December 5th, 2009 at 5:24 pmOver many years we have all been lied to by our Governments… But not just our Governments but many religous leaders. Many things we have been taught are not even in Scripture and millions have swallowed so many lies by these false prophets. If you are a truth seeker please visit the following web site and take the time to read some of the articles… You will be shocked.
THERE IS A GREAT NEW AUDIO THERE FOR YOU TO LISTEN TO. YOU WILL COME AWAY ASKING MANY QUESTIONS. REAL SHOCKING.
http://www.2besaved.com
Blessings as you seek truth
Ben